2 minutes on...The rise of cyberespionage

Warnings about the dire consequences of cyber-espionage and its affect on the national security of the United States and the business activities of American companies should be taken very seriously. In fact, the biggest cybercrime occurring today is the theft of business information, says Scott Borg, director and chief economist of the U.S. Cyber Consequences Unit, a nonprofit research institute.

“The threat of cyber-espionage on our critical infrastructure industries — the power grid, our transportation system and the country's financial systems — is just as great a threat to the U.S. military and government as the espionage aimed at those institutions,” he says. “They're not really separate anymore — the government and military are dependent on our infrastructure.”

What looks like industrial espionage has a potentially very large impact on the government's ability to carry out missions, he adds. “Some of the economic effects that are being blamed on globalization are actually the result of massive information theft, much of it accomplished by cyber-attacks.”

Tim Bennett, president of the Cyber Security Industry Alliance, a public policy advocacy group, agrees with Borg that the threat of an indirect, rather than direct, cyberattack against the U.S. government or military should be taken seriously. “Nobody wants to take on the U.S. directly in traditional military fashion.”

What an enemy can do, he says, is cripple the U.S. by crippling part of the critical infrastructure, such as control of the power grids, water systems and financial and transportation systems.

That said, cyber-espionage doesn't have to go to that extreme to benefit the perpetrators, says Dave Marcus, security research and communications manager at McAfee's Avert Labs, which recently released a report predicting that the rise in international cyber spying will pose the number one security threat in 2008.

“We're apt to see information gathering, or diverting information or inserting misinformation for financial gain,” he says. “Money will be the prime motivator. If it's worth money to X government, it will find a way to steal information even if it has to broker with someone. Ultimately, financial issues will drive cyber-espionage.”
— Jim Carr

Sign up to our newsletters

More in News

House Intelligence Committee OKs amended version of controversial CISPA

Despite the 18-to-2 vote in favor of the bill proposal, privacy advocates likely will not be satisfied, considering two key amendments reportedly were shot down.

Judge rules hospital can ask ISP for help in ID'ing alleged hackers

The case stems from two incidents where at least one individual is accused of accessing the hospital's network to spread "defamatory" messages to employees.

Three LulzSec members plead guilty in London

Ryan Ackroyd, 26; Jake Davis, 20; and Mustafa al-Bassam, 18, who was not named until now because of his age, all admitted their involvement in the hacktivist gang's attack spree.