Quality protection of data

Share this article:
Quality protection of data
Quality protection of data
I believe that doing things right the first time adds nothing to the cost of a product or service. What incurs cost  is doing things in a way that requires reworking – a cost that translates into wasted time, money, litigation and loss of reputation.

Massive data security breaches at retailers, such as The TJX Companies and more recently at the Hannaford supermarket chain, are a good case in point. In both instances, significant amounts of financial data were compromised by hackers, potentially exposing millions of consumers to credit card fraud. And in both cases, multiple lawsuits were filed shortly after the data intrusions became public.  

Circumstances surrounding the Hannaford breach, which exposed up to 4.2 million card numbers, are still surfacing. Yet, more than a year after TJX disclosed the largest credit and debit card data breach in history, banks continue to file lawsuits claiming damages due to card reissuance costs, monitoring expenses or fraud loss. That's on top of millions of dollars in charges TJX has already taken against earnings, plus up to $40.9 million for breach-related losses that TJX agreed to pay Visa in a settlement reached last fall. TJX has spent or set aside about $250 million for costs related to the breach in the past year. But that doesn't include lost business or reputational costs.

According to the Ponemon Institute, data breaches cost companies an average of $197 per record in 2007, and the average cost of a data breach was $6.3 million, up from $4.8 million in 2006.

If responsibility for shoring up a company's defenses against data leaks falls into your camp, ask yourself, “Does this solution conform to best practices for encrypting payment data? More fundamentally, are we storing and safeguarding that data in the best possible way? Or does outsourcing to software-as-a-service professionals make more sense than doing it ourselves?” In an era of continually cheaper data storage options, it's easy not to think critically about how much data should be retained, where it makes the most sense to store that data, and how best to protect it – until it's too late.

By defining quality you'll help build a culture of security awareness and responsibility that extends from the executive suite to the receptionist and all points in between.
Share this article:

Sign up to our newsletters

More in Opinions

Unfair competition: Proactive preemption can save you from litigation

Unfair competition: Proactive preemption can save you ...

With each job change, the risk that the new hire will bring confidential information or trade secrets with him or her to the new company grows.

Hackers only need to get it right once, we need to get it right every time

Hackers only need to get it right once, ...

Hackers only need to find one weak point to steal valuable information. On the flip side, security pros need to account for every possible scenario.

Successful strategies for continuous response

Successful strategies for continuous response

While it isn't realistic for organizations to expect that it will never happen to them, a rapid, professional and continuous response can limit their scope and reputational impact.