The data backlash: Privacy

Is resistance forming against data-sharing in America? The consensus seems to be a resounding 'yes,' reports Ashley Carman.

The data backlash: Privacy
The data backlash: Privacy
Americans have questions, and they want answers.

Thanks to former National Security Agency (NSA) contractor Edward Snowden exposing the U.S. government's penchant for data, and recent documents revealing the way law enforcement uses stingray devices to often collect innocent civilians' data, Americans are pushing their government, technology providers and anyone with access to their data for answers and accountability.

Plus, mounting evidence that living under the threat of surveillance is changing online habits and possibly stifling creativity is now prompting companies to modify products and change their approach to privacy.

A pair of Pew Research Center studies illustrates Americans' privacy woes. Research from November 2014 found that 91 percent of adults “agree” or “strongly agree” that consumers have lost control over how personal information is collected and used, and 80 percent agreed or strongly agreed that Americans should be concerned about the government's monitoring of phone calls and internet communications.

A second study from March of this year shows just how those beliefs translate into tangible behavior. Twenty-two percent of American adults say that since the Snowden revelations they've changed the patterns of their own use of various technological platforms “a great deal” or “somewhat.” 

That's not good news for a digital society where personal lives and business thrive on the flow of information, and innovation depends on people having the freedom to explore and work without government peering over their shoulders. While the percentage of people who've adjusted their online habits isn't a majority, it still represents more than 50 million Americans and doesn't even take into account the vast majority of Americans who are simply aware of government surveillance, or 87 percent of adults. 

“These are huge numbers,” says Omer Tene (left), vice president of research and education at the International Association of Privacy Professionals. They also demonstrate a privacy awareness that “certainly wasn't the case before the whole Snowden NSA story got out.”  

He explains that in the wake of those revelations, American society has seen a “spike in knowledge, awareness and interest from consumers and, correspondingly, from businesses that have to react to consumer sentiment.” 

Patrick Eddington, policy analyst in homeland security and civil liberties at the Cato Institute, a public policy research organization, agrees, positing that the world is seeing a “digital resistance movement.”

That resistance is apparent in Citizenfour, a documentary about Snowden's leaks. When discussing the documents he's downloaded from the NSA, Snowden takes care to avoid eavesdropping by unplugging his hotel room's phone. It's almost cringe-worthy paranoia. While most of us aren't Snowdens with a specific reason to worry about government surveillance, his concern and care seemed to preview the future of privacy and the lengths to which citizens might have to go to preserve theirs. 

With 54 percent of Pew Research respondents believing it would be “somewhat” or “very” difficult to find tools and strategies that would help them be more private online and with their cell phones, duct tape over a webcam can't be ruled out. But more thoughtful – and feasible – alternatives exist.

The lack of knowledge around privacy options “is an indication that public education needs to take place,” says Eddington (right). “There are excellent privacy tools out there, and they're getting easier to use with each passing month.”

For instance, the Blackphone, a privacy-driven mobile device from Silent Circle, features apps, including two that encrypt both phone calls and text messages, that attempt to give users control over their data.

“All of the sudden there's this manifestation of all those [privacy] fears being realized across what we're doing,” says Bill Conner, CEO of the Switzerland-based encrypted communications firm. Public discomfort with privacy issues is driving interest in his firm's platform, he says.

Page 1 of 2
You must be a registered member of SC Magazine to post a comment.
close

Next Article in Features

Sign up to our newsletters

TOP COMMENTS