Third-party employee steals personal information of 2.3 million Fidelity National Information Services employees

Share this article:
Who are the victims? 2.3 million customers of Fidelity National Information Services.

What happened? An employee of Certegy Check Services, a subsidiary, sold the information to an unidentified data broker, who sold some of it to direct marketing companies.

What type of personal information? 2.2 million records stolen from the Certegy contained bank account information and 99,000 contained credit card information.

What was the response? The Certegy employee, identified as a senior database administrator who had worked for the company for seven years, was fired. Certegy has found no fraudulent use of the personal information. An investigation by the U.S. Secret Service and the Pinellas County Sheriff’s Office is ongoing. Certegy has asked marketing companies to stop using the information and has contacted all major credit agencies. The company will notify all affected consumers of the theft.

Quote: “As a result of this apparent theft, the consumers affected received marketing solicitations from the companies that bought the data. We believe that is the extent of any damage to the public,” said Renz Nichols, Certegy president.

Note: Fidelity National Information Services is not related to Fidelity Investments.

Source:Company says worker stole, sold data,” Washington Post, July 4
Share this article:

Sign up to our newsletters

POLL

More in The Data Breach Blog

Malware on Backcountry Gear website, payment cards compromised

Malware was installed on the Backcountry Gear website for roughly three months, during which payment cards may have been compromised.

Programming error results in CVS Caremark mailing blunder

About 350 CVS Caremark customers are being notified that a programming error resulted in mailers containing their personal information being sent to the wrong customers.

Seattle University donor checks possibly exposed due to settings error

Seattle University is notifying an undisclosed number of donors that anyone with a Seattle University computer account could have viewed scanned checks.