Three security companies attempt to make mockery of the First Amendment

Most security companies, I like to believe, are noble and ethical enterprises. Yes they make good money out of the fact that the online world is a dark, scary place, but they also provide an invaluable service: protecting innocent individuals and organizations from the dangers that lurk in the shadows.

But when the hacker group Anonymous recently leaked a stolen slide deck that revealed how three security and intelligence firms (Palantir Technologies, HBGary Federal and Berico Technologies) planned to silence WikiLeaks, and its proponents, including a journalist, in the name of a possible lucrative contract from Bank of America, I was deeply offended and insulted.

(Palantir's CEO has since apologized).

My emotions did not just stem from the fact that the presentation's section on "potential proactive tactics" alluded to conducting illegal activities in order to bring down WikiLeaks, though that certainly raised some ire in me – especially when I consider that federal law enforcement only seems interested in going after those cybercriminals engaged in pro-WikiLeaks conduct, never the other way around.

But a major source of my frustration also emanated from the fact that the presentation suggested targeting arguably one of the world's most truth-telling, roving, talented, cogent and investigative journalists: Glenn Greenwald of Salon. Yes, he is one of my favorites, but that is not the reason I am here defending him.

In a blog post today, Greenwald did an admirable job of not just acknowledging the absurdity of the three companies' proposal but also defining how this situation ultimately reflects the class war being waged by society's most powerful and rich in order to get, you guessed it, more powerful and rich.

Greenwald is offended. Journalism is his livelihood. He is in the business of free speech. I am too.

So when security firms seemingly bent on winning a big contract essentially offer up their firepower, likely at the encouragement of the nation's biggest bank, to infringe on one of the most inherent rights of all Americans, we've got big problems.

Sign up for our newsletters

POLL

More in The News Team Blog

Here are eight cyber crooks who got less prison time than Andrew Auernheimer

Here are eight cyber crooks who got less ...

The security researcher and self-proclaimed internet troll earned 41 months behind bars Monday for his role in using a script to retrieve data on roughly 120,000 Apple iPad users from ...

The White House thinks Julian Assange and Jeremy Hammond are no different ...

Whistleblowing organizations like WikiLeaks and accused hacktivists like Hammond are not foreign spies lusting to plunder intellectual property from U.S. corporations and government agencies in order to profit and gain a competitive advantage.

Obama would prefer to prosecute leakers than discuss Stuxnet

The FBI and DoJ are targeting high-level U.S. officials in hopes of learning who released classified information about Stuxnet to the press. What the government is not doing is publicly explaining why it launched Stuxnet.