Supreme Court rules on computer data privacy

Share this article:

Data on a hard drive is not equal to the same material stored in a filing cabinet, according to the Supreme Court of Canada.

In a complex ruling on the case of a British Columbia man convicted of growing marijuana, the court determined that a search of his computer violated his Section 8 rights under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Thanh Long Vu of Langley still faces additional prosecution – because the high court decided to admit evidence obtained through illegal search – but the ruling established what the Canadian Bar Association's journal called “a marker (in the ground) for digital privacy law in Canada.”

Vu's lawyer, Neil Cobb, succeeded in convincing the justices that computers are “stand-alone places” that require specific search warrants.

While Vu's future now rests with provincial authorities in British Columbia, the Supreme Court will soon hear another landmark case – involving a cell phone search – that legal experts predict will help define digital rights in Canada.


Share this article:
You must be a registered member of SC Magazine to post a comment.
close

Next Article in SC Canada

THE LATEST ISSUE

Features

Archive of SC Magazine Canada

SC Magazine Canada

THE LATEST ISSUE

Features

Archive of SC Magazine Canada

SC Magazine Canada

More in SC Canada

Childrens' Hospital apologizes for rogue employee breach

Alberta Health Services is apologizing following a data breach at Alberta Children's Hospital.

Canadian launches $500m class action against Home Depot

A Canadian is leading a $500 million class-action lawsuit against Home Depot following its data breach in which up to 56 million US and Canadian credit cards were stolen.

Faulty UBC software exposed student financial information

Students at the University of British Columbia have been warned that their personal information may have been exposed thanks to a software bug.