Did lack of common-sense cybersecurity decide the presidential election?!

There is little debate that this election will be described as a referendum on the status quo, with very strong anti-establishment and anti-elitist sentiment driving record numbers of unexpected voters to the polls. But that doesn't tell the complete story. Yes, the Hillary Clinton campaign brought the current administration out in force in the final weeks, thus cementing her image as an entrenched Washington insider. But I can't help but think that this status quo image began to be shaped and hardened as a direct result of the leaked insider communications exposed on WikiLeaks and as a result of the hacked DNC network and campaign chair John Podesta's emails. In the devastating DNC hack, there were many revelations that fueled the rhetoric that Hillary was given preferential treatment by the DNC party officials, including the discussion of an anti-Bernie strategy and coordinating anti-Sanders messaging. There was even a head-slapping response to the realization that a shared password was compromised by…wait for it…emailing out a new password. Doh! In a previous blog I described the Podesta hack as a(nother) lesson in two-factor authentication. It looks likely that Podesta fell victim to a typical phishing scheme, compromising his email and Twitter accounts. If that is the case, this embarrassing event could have easily been avoided with the common-sense use of two-factor authentication. The Podesta emails exposed insider communications that included revelations about Hillary that could be interpreted as pro-establishment, Washington insider and elitist:
  • Her instincts will always be to side with law enforcement with respect to government surveillance and strong encryption
  • She wouldn't come out against Keystone Pipeline because she wants to support President Obama in public
  • She gave a speech with “a long riff about economic fairness and how the financial industry has lost its way, precisely for the purpose of having something we could show people if ever asked what she was saying behind closed doors for two years to all those fat cats…”
It seems that the DNC chair shared debate questions ahead of time giving her an insider advantage Perhaps the rhetoric is correct and Hillary is indeed a political elite too entrenched in Washington to appeal to the majority of mainstream America. Or perhaps, the lack of basic cyber hygiene ultimately contributed to the damaging image of Hillary as a Washington insider representing the status quo and thus leading to the stunning results of the 2016 presidential election.  Let's all take a moment to fully realize that the cybersecurity decisions that we make can have a profound impact on the foundation and direction of our business, partners, customers and even our country.

By Corey Williams, Senior Director, Product Management and Marketing, Centrify

Get daily email updates

SC Media's daily must-read of the most current and pressing daily news

By clicking the Subscribe button below, you agree to SC Media Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.